XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Simple, or dumbed down?

My working principle is this: start simple because it will get more complex before you know it.

TomP

On 12/21/2016 4:36 PM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Hi Folks,

Is XML 1.0 a simple data format language, or a dumbed down data format
language?

Is JSON a simple data format language, or a dumbed down data format
language?

Is XML Schema 1.0 a simple schema language, or a dumbed down schema
language?

Is XSLT 1.0 a simple XML scripting language, or a dumbed down XML
scripting language?

Is simplicity good (because it makes languages and notations accessible
to the masses), or does simplicity merely lower the collective
intelligence of the planet?

Do richer, more expressive, more complex languages and notations elevate
the collective intelligence of the planet, or do they merely form
priesthoods?

Should the role of standards organizations be to create simple standards
to make them accessible to the masses, or should standards organizations
invite the masses to stretch to new intellectual heights?

/Roger








[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS