Re: [xml-dev] What are the practical, negative consequences of thinkingt

[Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net>]

"Arborescent, semi-structured" data was covered pretty well, long before 
json, by Abiteboul and Bunemanin in

"Data on the Web: From Relations to Semistructured Data and XML"

The notation used there was nearly the same as what would become json, 
IIRC.

On 2/16/2017 11:16 AM, Ghislain Fourny wrote:
> I agree with Eliot. Both XML and JSON are relevant and both have
> their own strengths. What matters in the end is that this is all
> arborescent, semi-structured data, and that both, in the end, need
> the same kind of technology (parsing, validating, transforming,
> querying, updating, storing, etc).