Re: [xml-dev] xml:base and fragments

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com>
To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 08:10:53 -0400

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:

(a) we know the web is built on a foundation of shifting sand

I would say rather that the supposed foundation was just scaffolding and rather overbuilt at that, designed for superstructure that never came to pass. Similarly, SGML was thought to be the foundation of HTML, but turned out to be its amniotic sac.

GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] xml:base and fragments
  - From: Andrew Sales <andrew@andrewsales.com>

References:
- xml:base and fragments
  - From: "John P. McCaskey" <mailbox@johnmccaskey.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml:base and fragments
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml:base and fragments
  - From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml:base and fragments
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml:base and fragments
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml:base and fragments
  - From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]