XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=5Bxml=2Ddev=5D_Representing_binary_trees_in_XML_=E2=80=A6_f?==?UTF-8?Q?lat_versus_recursive?=



On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:45 AM Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote:
 

Recursive Implementation

The root node consists of a value, an optional left subtree, and an optional right subtree.

A subtree is a node.

A node consists of a value, an optional left subtree, and an optional right subtree.

Here is a recursive XML representation of the above binary tree:

A simpler XML approach is to use elements named root-node, left-node, and right-node.  That reduces the number of levels in the tree by half.

In addition, I don't know of any parsers that use recursion in the language to support recursion in the tree; the nesting is normally stored as an array of element objects, either fixed (in which case you get an error) or growable.  Such a structure can of course be traversed in XSLT, but not with native traversal mechanisms..  Your flat representation doesn't gain you much, then.


John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
Cash registers don't really add and subtract;
        they only grind their gears.
But then they don't really grind their gears, either;
        they only obey the laws of physics.  --Unknown

PNG image



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS