XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Does it make sense to have a default with a nillable element?

Hi Folks,

The following XML Schema declares an element to be nillable and the element has a default value:

<xs:element name="test" type="xs:string" nillable="true" default="Hello, world" />

That is legal but is it meaningful?

What does this (schema-valid) XML instance mean:

<test xsi:nil="true"></test>

xsi:nil="true" indicates that there is no information available for the <test> element. The default value indicates that there is information available for the <test> element and the information is "Hello, world". 

Right? 

Isn't that a contradiction?

/Roger



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS