XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Re: ***SPAM*** [xml-dev] Resource relationships

I'm still disappointed about XLink's failure to catch on.  I still think it'd solve significant real-world problems that I still encounter.  But obviously the browser builders didn't see it that way and maybe they were right.  That said, at the point in history when XLink appeared, the browser-builder politics and dysfunction were pretty nasty, so perhaps there's an element of bad luck at work.  Can't complain too much, XML enjoyed a massive stroke of good luck by arriving at a time when there was no decent open interchange format at all and a massive undiscovered hunger for such a thing.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:35 AM Liam R. E. Quin <liam@fromoldbooks.org> wrote:
On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 05:33 +0000, Hans-Juergen Rennau wrote:
>
> QUESTION 1. Why is XLink little adopted

It solved the wrong problem. That is, the primary use case it addressed
was, markup to include in one's doucment that could be identified by
soeone outside one's own organization or domain as a link. But that is
solving someone else's problem.

What was needed was something like HyTime Architectural Forms, to say,
in this DTD, in this document, such-and-such an attribute, or element,
or combination, represents a link, and _this_is how you construct the
URL from it.

But the working group became mired in arguments and politics.

It should be noted that some of the features XLink provides still have
no standard counterpart in HTML. Practical use cases and examples may
have made a difference, but HTML already had a/@href and img/@src, and
these canbe used in XML DTDs as easily as XLink.

A regret that i have is that an architectural forms route might have
let us say, "in this vocabulary, the following elements are paragraph-
like and these other ones are phrase-like", enabling search engines to
present useful snippets.

>  - can you identify important mistakes or omissions?QUESTION 2.
> Imagining for a moment, XLink were widely adopted, would a "link::"
> axis in XPath make sense, enabling expressions like:   /
> ancestor::airports / child::airport / link::airportDetails / @name

Or a follow() function maybe. Note that XLink permits multiple links on
an element, so one would need a way to say which links were of
interest.

Liam

--
Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/
Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/
XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting.
Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations:  http://www.fromoldbooks.org


_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS