XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Static versus dynamic – which is better?

Hi Folks,

The question of whether to use a static or dynamic technique is encountered frequently in the real world. Here are three examples:

A cybersecurity person must decide whether to analyze a potentially dangerous binary file by using a hex editor to inspect the bytes (i.e., static analysis) or analyze the file by executing it in a detonation chamber (i.e., dynamic analysis).

A person exercising must decide whether to stretch a muscle by getting into a stretched position and then holding that position (i.e., static stretching) or by taking the muscle repeatedly through a range of motion (i.e., dynamic stretching).

A person that is mapping data items from system A to system B must decide whether to describe the mapping rules declaratively, perhaps using tables or an XML document (i.e., static mapping) or encode the mapping rules in software – executing the software results in converting instances of system A’s data into instances of system B’s data (i.e., dynamic mapping).

I am seeking additional examples of where static versus dynamic is encountered in the real-world. Would you provide an example, please?

/Roger



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS