=?utf-8?B?UmU6IFt4bWwtZGV2XSBTdGF0aWMgdmVyc3VzIGR5bmFtaWMg4oCTIHdoaWNo?=

[Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org>]

Hi Mukul,

 

Thank you. I think you are onto something. I am currently trying to understand a complicated program that someone wrote. One approach to is to examine the code and try to understand what it is doing. That is a static approach. Another is to run the code under the control of a debugger and step through it to understand what the program is doing. That is a dynamic approach.

 

Thanks!

 

/Roger

 

From: Mukul Gandhi <mukulg@softwarebytes.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 1:00 AM
To: Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org>
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: [xml-dev] Static versus dynamic – which is better?

 

On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 6:01 PM Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> wrote:

I am seeking additional examples of where static versus dynamic is encountered in the real-world.

 

In programming languages data typing approach? i.e whether the type of a variable/object is determined statically (at compile time) or dynamically (at run time). 

 

--

Regards,

Mukul Gandhi