Re: [xml-dev] Re: LPDs

[Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

> I've noticed somewhat of a defensive gut reaction by XML heads
> whenever SGML comes up. While I use XML all the time, and plan to
> continue doing so, let me bluntly say that XML's only raison d'etre,
> by the XML spec's own wording (as in chapter 1, sentence 1), was to
> replace SGML as a markup meta-language on the web.

Which was last century? Perhaps rather than being defensive, we don't
all  wish the past to influence development?

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.