XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?



On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 9:24 PM Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> wrote:
Is a Swiss Army knife (SGML) over-engineered compared to a knife and fork (XML)?  For the people who need to do complex things, no. For the people who need to do a few simple things, yes.  

I like the sentiment of the post but I have always seen the Swiss Army Knife as the epitome of under-engineering. Capable of doing everything .....badly.  

No dis on SGML over which I plead ignorance, more wondering whether that's the apt analogy for it. 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS