[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Many different syntaxes in XML - is that good languagedesign?
- From: Damian Morris <damian@moso.com.au>
- To: Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 02:02:19 +0000
> On 7 Mar 2022, at 10:14 pm, Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> Dealing with lots of different syntaxes is hard. For example, I never remember the syntax for CDATA sections (in fact, I had to look it up just now).
A counter-point to this is that dealing with clearly differentiated syntaxes makes recognising them much simpler, and thereby more reliable - which makes the parsers easier to construct.
It can also feel like less “magic incantations” to the user - ie, fewer small, apparently arbitrary syntax variations, which makes it simpler to know which particular syntax to use for each particular type of document construct.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]