XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The limits of XML mean the limits of my data world

> They of course don’t work from the text serialization of the MusicXML ...

Exactly.  An XML-based language can be used behind the scenes in one or more ingredients for the preparation of the scores, but the musicians don't have to even be aware of this fact. Thus, XML is not their language.

As for expressibility, one can write anything using a fixed alphabet, even with the minimal one: {0, 1} . This does not make the alphabet "our language"

The fact that I am Bulgarian and am using the Cyrillic alphabet, combined with the fact that Cyrillic is one of the alphabets used for the standard dialect of Mongolian language, doesn't mean that "I know Mongolian" nor does it mean that a Mongolian person and I both have the same language.

Thanks,
Dimitre

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 1:54 PM <list.mu@c-moria.com> wrote:

Hi Dimitri,

 

Not sure about directors of large orchestras, but definitely the musicians themselves use iPads a lot for reading the score

They of course don’t work from the text serialization of the MusicXML but I know for a fact that the possibility for a score reader app to handle MusicXML is an important criteria in the selection of the app.

Options such as showing different voices only at selected times can be very helpful (when you go in a dialogue with a second instrument, or when you have to rest for 16 bars, it helps showing parts of the score of your colleagues), rarely offered from the PDF score, easily from the MusicXML

 

Best regards

Geert

 

 

 

 

From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, 30 May 2022 21:50
To: Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex <gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de>
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] RE: The limits of XML mean the limits of my data world

 

 

 

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:04 PM Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex <gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de> wrote:

A friend of mine, a pianist, arranger and composer who also teaches
music at Leipzig's academy of music and theater, writes his compositions
in Finale [1] and exchanges them with other people as MusicXML. MusicXML
supports overlapping staff groups, as can be seen in example
41f-StaffGroups-Overlapping.xml on [2]. MusicXML's slurs are "composed"
of milestone elements, as can be seen in [3], adopting a popular method
to represent overlap in XML.

I don't have statistics about how many contemporary composers write
music conventionally on sheets or electronically with Finale etc., but I
guess that most of them use software nowadays. And this software more
likely than not has XML as an exchange or even as a native storage
format. And that XML interchange format is able to represent overlap.

 

Thanks Gerrit,

 

The question was if there existed even a single conductor who when directing an orchestra uses not the traditional musical scores, but some XML-document instead?

If there is no such example, is this just by chance? Or is there a sound reason why conductors prefer using musical scores to using them expressed in some XML  form?

 

Maybe simplicity, readability and understandability?

Maybe choosing the most suitable, most specific and appropriate form feels better for them than the more general (universal) form? Maybe a carpenter could do their job just using a swiss knife? But do they?

 

Dimitre

 

 

Gerrit

[1] https://www.finalemusic.com/products/finale/
[2]
https://web.mit.edu/music21/doc/developerReference/musicxmlTest.html#multiple-parts-staves
[3]
https://www.w3.org/2021/06/musicxml40/musicxml-reference/examples/slur-element/



On 30.05.2022 20:29, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:13 PM Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
> <gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de <mailto:gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de>> wrote:
>
>     You can express or represent (I regard both terms as synonymous wrt the
>     current discussion) such an overlap in XML, see for example how the
>     Common Music Notation handles overlap in beams or slurs (search for
>     "overlap" on [1]). It's just that you cannot express it using
>     overlapping elements.
>
>     [1] https://music-encoding.org/guidelines/v4/content/cmn.html
>     <https://music-encoding.org/guidelines/v4/content/cmn.html>
>
>
> The fact is that no conductor in the world is using CMN, do they? :)
>
> Just the "old-fashioned", non-xml-based musical scores ...
>
> If "XML is one's language" and they have to conduct an orchestra, what
> are the chances they will use CMN and not  the  "old-fashioned",
> non-xml-based musical scores ?
> Does even a single such example exist?
>
> Luckily, no one has ever tried to represent a Venn diagram with XML...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "If the only tool you have is a hammer, it is tempting to treat
> everything as if it were a nail"
> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_instrument
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_instrument>)
>
> To quote from this source:
>
> The notion of a /golden hammer,/ "a familiar technology or concept
> applied obsessively to many software problems", was introduced into
> information technology
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology> literature in
> 1998 as an anti-pattern <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-pattern>: a
> programming practice to be avoided.
>
> Software developer José M. Gilgado has written that the law is still
> relevant in the 21st century and is highly applicable to software
> development. Many times software developers, he observed, "tend to use
> the same known tools to do a completely new different project with new
> constraints". He blamed this on "the comfort zone
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comfort_zone> state where you don't
> change anything to avoid risk. The problem with using the same tools
> every time you can is that you don't have enough arguments to make a
> choice because you have nothing to compare to and is limiting your
> knowledge." The solution is "to keep looking for the best possible
> choice, even if we aren't very familiar with it".
>
>
> Cheers,
> Dimitre
>
>
>
>     On 30.05.2022 05:55, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>      >  >   > XML may not be good at representing concurrency (overlap
>     just on
>      > one-dimension -- time).
>      >  >
>      >  >   Is this an example of concurrency?
>      >
>      > Concurrency is any overlap on the time axis.
>      >
>      > A good example is the scores used by the director of an orchestra.
>      > Because of the concurrency of playing of the different groups of
>     musical
>      > instruments within an orchestra, their scores are printed not in one
>      > continuous linear line, but on many parallel horizontal lines one
>     below
>      > the other as the musical durations of non-paused play of these
>     different
>      > instrumental groups overlap horizontally, where the
>     horizontal axis from
>      > left to write expresses the time.
>      >
>      > Say you have a violin and a clarinet. The violin plays a single
>     tone in
>      > the interval [t1, t2] and the clarinet plays another tone in the
>      > interval [t3, t4]. And   t1 < t3 < t2 < t4    or    t3 < t1 < t4
>     < t2.
>      >
>      > With XML one cannot represent such partial overlaps, but overlaps
>     where
>      > one of the durations completely contains the other (which is not
>      > generally the rule in music), can be represented by two elements,
>     the
>      > second of which is contained in the scope of the first: t1 <= t3
>     < t4 <=
>      > t2   or t3 <= t1 < t2 <=t4
>      >
>      >
>      > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 12:08 PM Roger L Costello
>     <costello@mitre.org <mailto:costello@mitre.org>
>      > <mailto:costello@mitre.org <mailto:costello@mitre.org>>> wrote:
>      >
>      >     Peter wrote:
>      >
>      >      > overlap can be expressed but not represented
>      >
>      >     I am not clear what you mean by "overlap". Is this an example of
>      >     overlap:
>      >
>      >     Classroom1 is used for teaching math, science, and writing.
>      >     Classroom2 is used for teaching art, history, and writing.
>      >
>      >     There is overlap between the topics taught in classroom1 and
>      >     classroom2 -- writing. Is that what you mean by "overlap"?
>      >
>      >     If so, can't that be expressed in XML something like this:
>      >
>      >     <Classrooms>
>      >          <Classroom1>
>      >              <ClassesTaught>
>      >                  <Class>math</Class>
>      >                  <Class>science</Class>
>      >                  <Class>writing</Class>
>      >              </ClassesTaught>
>      >          </Classroom1>
>      >          <Classroom2>
>      >              <ClassesTaught>
>      >                  <Class>art</Class>
>      >                  <Class>history</Class>
>      >                  <Class>writing</Class>
>      >              </ClassesTaught>
>      >          </Classroom2>
>      >     </Classrooms>
>      >
>      >     Dimitre wrote:
>      >
>      >      > XML may not be good at representing concurrency (overlap
>     just on
>      >     one-dimension -- time).
>      >
>      >     Is this an example of concurrency?
>      >
>      >     During times 1 - 3 John Doe is driving from Boston to NYC and
>     during
>      >     the same times Sally Smith is driving from LA to San Diego.
>      >
>      >     Is that an example of what you mean? If so, can't that be
>     expressed
>      >     in XML something like this:
>      >
>      >     <DrivingTrips>
>      >          <Person>
>      >              <Name>John Doe</Name>
>      >              <Itinerary>
>      >                  <Start>Boston</Start>
>      >                  <End>NYC</End>
>      >              </Itinerary>
>      >              <DriveTimes>
>      >                  <Time1/>
>      >                  <Time2/>
>      >                  <Time3/>
>      >              </DriveTimes>
>      >          </Person>
>      >          <Person>
>      >              <Name>Sally Smith</Name>
>      >              <Itinerary>
>      >                  <Start>LA</Start>
>      >                  <End>San Diego</End>
>      >              </Itinerary>
>      >              <DriveTimes>
>      >                  <Time1/>
>      >                  <Time2/>
>      >                  <Time3/>
>      >              </DriveTimes>
>      >          </Person>
>      >     </DrivingTrips>
>      >
>      >     Peter said:
>      >
>      >      > CSV is better at expressing row-and-column type data.
>      >
>      >     That might well be true, but it is possible to express
>      >     row-and-column concepts in XML. That is, the row-and-column
>     concept
>      >     in not outside the realm of concepts expressible by the XML
>     language.
>      >
>      >      > Various forms of database are better at expressing other
>     layouts
>      >     of atomic and relational data.
>      >
>      >     Again, that might well be true but the concept of a table is
>      >     expressible in XML.
>      >
>      >     Thank you Peter, Dimitre, and Gerrit but you haven't (yet)
>     convinced
>      >     me that there are concepts that are outside the realm of concepts
>      >     expressible using the language called XML.
>      >
>      >     A friend of mine is Chinese and today I asked her: "Are there
>      >     concepts that you can express in English that you cannot
>     express in
>      >     Chinese?" She responded, "Yes, there are concepts in English for
>      >     which there is no equivalent in Chinese." (The reverse is
>     also true
>      >     -- there are concepts that can be expressed in Chinese that
>     cannot
>      >     be expressed in English.)
>      >
>      >     Are there concepts in data language XYZ that cannot be
>     expressed in
>      >     the data language we call XML? What are the boundaries of the
>      >     language we call XML, in terms of concepts that can be expressed?
>      >     How does the XML language bound (limit) ones thinking about data?
>      >
>      >     /Roger
>      >
>
>     _______________________________________________________________________
>
>     XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
>     to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
>     spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
>     [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
>     <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/>
>     Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
>     <mailto:xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org>
>     subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
>     <mailto:xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org>
>     List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>     <http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/>
>     List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>     <http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
> ---------------------------------------
> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
> -------------------------------------
> Never fight an inanimate object
> -------------------------------------
> To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
> biggest mistake of all
> ------------------------------------
> Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
> -------------------------------------
> You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
> you're doing is work or play
> -------------------------------------
> To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
> -------------------------------------
> Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
> -------------------------------------
> Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
> write all patents, too? :)
> -------------------------------------
> Sanity is madness put to good use.
> -------------------------------------
> I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.


_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php


 

--

Cheers,

Dimitre Novatchev

---------------------------------------

Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.

---------------------------------------

To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk

-------------------------------------

Never fight an inanimate object

-------------------------------------

To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the

biggest mistake of all

------------------------------------

Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.

-------------------------------------

You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play

-------------------------------------

To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.

-------------------------------------

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.

-------------------------------------

Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write all patents, too? :)

-------------------------------------

Sanity is madness put to good use.

-------------------------------------

I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

 



--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
Sanity is madness put to good use.
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS