XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Editor that is easy to use, generates XML under the hood, andsupports tables?

Hi Folks,

Okay, I convinced my sponsor that specifications should be written in a way that they can be processed by software. More specifically, I convinced my sponsor that, under the hood, specifications should be in an XML format. My sponsor said, "Okay, fine .... provided, (1) there is a non-geeky editor that is easy for the specification writer to use, (2) the specification writer is unaware that the editor is generating XML under the hood, and (3) the generated XML is easy to understand. One more thing, (4) the editor MUST support tables."

Peter Flynn wrote:

> That is a sort of holy grail: that users will be able to create and 
> maintain their document in meaningful XML without knowing 
> they are doing it.

Eek!

Did I mislead my sponsor by recommending that specifications be written in a way that can be processed by software? 

/Roger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS