>
> Granted the Web Services example is the only one that
> actually mentioned Web Service in the text. However, that's
> not a sufficient reason to put it back. Let's change some of
> the text in the other examples and explicitly put Web Service
> in if that's what bothers people. I think it's kind of
> implicit anyway.
>
We actually decided to address this problem by identifying all of the
use cases as examples where Web Services are involved. The new version
of the document you're going to receive talks about Web Services in most
cases :-)
.savas.
