terminology

Hello,

 

As I was suggesting on conf. call today, we should 
have glossary of terms that we are going to use while defining specifications. 
Peter Furniss agreed to define 4 levels. I suggest that we extend that 
list gradually as we progress. This must also be a list of terms 
that will be used consistently across subcommittees. I suggest a 
person involved in subcommittees of specification doc. and protocol model should 
take care of this. 

 

For example, if one looks at various ebXML 
specifications, one can find number of definitions for the same term, e.g. 
Conversation. This creates a lot of confusion. 

 

thanks,

sanjay