Martin,
I'm not in love with it either - but supposedly this is pukka
XPath style accessing.
If you can convince me of something that is more natural
and also reflects XPath (maybe XPath 2.0?) - I think that
we should consider it.
The idea behind the syntax as is - was that standard code
written to parse XPath would be purposed to handle this.
However - if this is not a valid assumption - lets re-visit this!
It would also be nice to have a more object centric approach
item.equal = 'testvalue'
Thoughts?
Thanks, DW.
===================================================
Message text written by INTERNET:
>I hate the notation
token='%param%'and contains(value,'testvalue')
What would be wrong with
equal(%param%,'testvalue')
I am going to change my examples to this as I feel I can process them more
easily.
Martin<
