Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [cam] Schema conformance problems - paper from Extreme 2003

From
David RR Webber <>
Date
2004-05-12T13:11:23+00:00
ID
00e201c43823$21725b90$6401a8c0@DRRW01
Thread
Re: [cam] Schema conformance problems - paper from Extreme 2003
Chris,

 

Yeah - but fortunately with CAM the setMask() 
predicate

means you can find tune the base type to the real 
model

needed.  Then again - the 
<ContentReference> approach

gives you the equivalent of an extensible type 
dictionary.

 

I guess we're about augmenting schema and 
filling

those gaping holes for people - but you gotta 
know

where the holes are.  Too many people are in 

denial right now - and Bob's piece certainly 
makes

them think!

 

Cheers, DW.

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
   

  
To:  ;  

  
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:39 
  AM

  
Subject: RE: [cam] Schema conformance 
  problems - paper from Extreme 2003

  

  

  
Well step one drop 
  support for XML Schema data types  J

  
 

  

  
Chris 
  Hipson

  

  

  
  

  
From: David 
  RR Webber [mailto:] 
Sent: 11 May 2004 19:32
To: CAM TC
Subject: [cam] Schema conformance 
  problems - paper from Extreme 2003

  
 

  

  
http://www.idealliance.org/papers/extreme03/html/2003/Lyons01/EML2003Lyons01-toc.html

  

  
 

  

  
I've asked Bob for a critique of 
  CAM 
  too!

  

  
 

  

  
Standby!

  

  
 

  

  
Enjoy, 
  DW
Next in thread → Next in month →