← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [camp-comment] Response to call for comments: "application packag", "_uri", and "DP example"
Martin, Many thanks for taking the time to read and comment. I have logged this feedback in https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-164 The TC will discuss this during one of its meetings and I will let you know of the outcome. Regards, Martin Chapman. From: Martin P Pain [mailto:] Sent: 03 March 2014 10:37 To: Subject: [camp-comment] Response to call for comments: "application packag", "_uri", and "DP example" 1. In section 1.3 Example, it talks about "application package". Is this the same thing as a "Plan resource" (compare with section 2.3)? 2. Do the property names need "_uri" on the end? By putting that on, you prevent using the same property name in future for an inlined version of the linked resource (if a future spec version allows it, e.g. to allow the reduction of HTTP requests needed to get certain information/resources). A property named "operations" on an assembly resource (as indeed the arrow is labelled in the 2nd diagram in section 2.2.6) would have exactly the same semantics as a property named "operations_uri", when the value is a string containing a URI. The advantage of the former would be the possible widening of the allowed value type in future, as mentioned just now, where the value would be a JSON object rather than a string. 3. Example 5 (s4.2.2.1) still says "DP" while example 6 has changed this to "Plan" Some spelling/grammar points which aren't part of changes from the previous comment period: 4. Section 2.7 Representation skew: "it exists but it an intermediate state" should be "it exists but in an intermediate state". 5. In various places the informal spelling "thru" is used. I would expect this to be "through". Martin Pain Software Developer - Green Hat Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration - Automation WG joint chair E-mail: Find me on: and within IBM on: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →