Re: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing

From
Jeff Kenton <>
Date
2003-02-21T18:54:51+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing
Hal Lockhart wrote:
> I like Steve's proposal.
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Steve Anderson [mailto:]
>>Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:30 PM
>>To: 
>>Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing
>>

    ...

>>  If we take this path, the replacement text would be:
>>
>>    "Email votes require majority of TC membership in order to pass."
>>

Note that a literal reading of this phrase makes deliberate abstentions equivalent to "NO" votes.

--- 
--------------------------
Jeff Kenton
DataPower Technology, Inc.