Yep. Lack of positive response from the membership results in the vote failing to pass, and the status quo prevails.
--
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Kenton [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Hal Lockhart
Cc: Steve Anderson;
Subject: Re: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing
Hal Lockhart wrote:
> I like Steve's proposal.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Steve Anderson [mailto:]
>>Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:30 PM
>>To:
>>Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing
>>
...
>> If we take this path, the replacement text would be:
>>
>> "Email votes require majority of TC membership in order to pass."
>>
Note that a literal reading of this phrase makes deliberate abstentions equivalent to "NO" votes.
---
--------------------------
Jeff Kenton
DataPower Technology, Inc.
