Philpott, Robert wrote:
> [Rob] I personally also do not care for the date, but we should probably
> leave it up to each TC or submitter to choose. It can't appear in the OASIS
> standard name, which I like and I'd prefer not to see it on final committee
> specs. But if a TC wants to use that approach, why not let them
Fair enough. I will add it as an example that's vaguely deprecated,
unless someone objects.
> [Rob] I'm not aware of any modern systems that continue to have problems
> with such names; does anyone else? I think the dots are cleaner looking
> than "_" (ugh!) or "p" (double ugh!) :-) - I say we stick with the dots.
I'd be fine with this. Again, unless someone objects, I'll plan to keep
the dots.
> Do you think it's worth adding an explanation of why hyphens are recommended
> and underscores are just "may". I'm okay with the current recommended/may
> wording - it's just a minor suggestion.
Good idea. Will do.
Eve
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
