On 20 Feb 2003 at 13:29, Tom Rutt wrote:
> Jon Bosak wrote:
>
> > In mail votes the concept of a quorum is meaningless, because in
> > mail everyone is always present. This also has nothing to do with
> > counting the votes.
> That is assuming the email vote is announed in sufficient advance
> of the due date that no member can miss it due to a simple thing
> like a vacation for three weeks.
How does this differ from missing votes in phone meetings that are
called during that three-week period?
Lauren
--
Lauren Wood, Chair, Entity Resolution TC
