Rex,
All is not lost! This has been discussed internally
by the TC chairs and a number of alternates offered.
We're not all control freeks! ; -)
There is a report being drafted that is reviewing the requirements first.
So - OK - this is all bureaucracy bullshit - but at least the wheels are
turning,
Now if I can just get them to do urgent things - like create the subteams
we need in Kavi for the BCM TC - (only been waiting two months now),
then we could really make progress.
Cheers, DW.
=====================================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rex Brooks" <>
To: <>; "Monica Martin" <>;
"Farrukh Najmi" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:48 AM
Subject: [chairs] Re: [regrep] [Fwd: ObjectRef and RegistryObject need
common base type]
> Folks,
>
> I caught this on the ebxml registry list and while I have not checked
> on the actual procedures in place with regard to the current
> manifestation of OASIS poolicy on the public comment lists, I find
> this unexceptional. With apologies to OASIS, I have to say that I
> find the current policy to have, in effect, killed the public comment
> lists, to the detriment of the TCs and OASIS at large at a time when
> many of us are trying our best to improve the stature of OASIS in the
> arena of standards bodies. This is a shame, and I must admit that I
> have, in effect, also thrown in the towel because it is a fight that
> I doubt we can win. The official mind is made up, and regardless of
> the rationale, the effect may already be irreversible. After more
> than two years of working on the Human Markup Language, I have
> concluded that one would be foolish to stand in the line of fire when
> any human being or group of humans decides to shoot itself in the
> foot.
>
> As Pogo observed, "We have met the enemy and it is us."
>
> Ciao, but sadly,
> Rex
>
> At 10:00 PM -0600 9/25/03, Monica Martin wrote:
> >Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> >
> >>It seems that the regrep-comments list is now requiring that the
> >>sender be subscribed? This does not seem right. Should we not allow
> >>an external commenter to send comments unimpeded? I could not even
> >>figure out how to tell Mei Zhao to subscribe. Kathryn, could you
> >>please look into a solution to this recurring problem.
> >>
> >>In any event the issue/suggestion below seems to make good sense
> >>from an OO stand point.
> >
> >mm1: On the suggestion, sounds reasonable. On the issue about
> >comment list, I seem to remember some kind of an issue with Kavi and
> >the fact that the comment signup was either not intuitive or didn't
> >work correctly. The webmaster should know on the system aspects. As
> >to the change in process, I can't answer there.
> >
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
> >roster of the OASIS TC), go to
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup
.php.
>
>
> --
> Rex Brooks
> GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
> W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
> Email:
> Tel: 510-849-2309
> Fax: By Request
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/chairs/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
