Re: [chairs] need your comments on DocMgmt system requirements

From
David RR Webber <>
Date
2004-02-18T21:39:45+00:00
ID
061401c3f669$6deb6c10$6501a8c0@DRRW01
Thread
Re: [chairs] need your comments on DocMgmt system requirements
Matt,

 

Did we mention that the cost of the tools was 
deductable from Adobe's annual membership fee

and qualifies for a tax-credit as a 
donation?!?  ; -)

 

DW.

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
  Matthew MacKenzie 
  

  
To: David RR Webber 

  
Cc: Chairs OASIS ; Rogers, Tony ; 
   ; Christopher B 
  Ferris 

  
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:45 
  PM

  
Subject: Re: [chairs] need your comments 
  on DocMgmt system requirements

  

Hmm...I suppose I should be suggesting a PDF based solution, 
  eh? I thought that would be too blatant. Of course, we have a set of tools 
  which could fix all of Oasis' problems, but they aint free! 

Just go 
  down to <software retailer> and buy Adobe Framemaker 7.1. Tell them Matt 
  sent you, sometimes you will be given a discount :-)

-Matt

On 
  Feb 18, 2004, at 5:35 PM, David RR Webber wrote:

  Matt,
 
I'm 
    still holding out till Adobe gives all spec' editors a free copy of the
full 
    Acrobat editor.... ; -)
 
DW.
----- 
    Original Message -----
From: 
Matthew 
    MacKenzie 

I'd be resistant to spending 
    significant time and money to support more efficient MS Word authoring, when 
    what we need to do is come up with a better way to collaborate on documents. 
    I'm not entirely certain of the solution here, but I have a feeling it needs 
    to be based on a document standard that is not 
  proprietary.

___________________________
Matthew 
  MacKenzie
Senior 
  Architect
Intelligent Documents Business Unit
Adobe Systems Canada 
  Inc.
http://www.adobe.com/
506 
869.0949