Well, our output is for DITA. We can
produce PDF, HTML, and chm.
JoAnn
JoAnn Hackos PhD
Co-Chair, DITA Adoption TC
Comtech Services, Inc.
Skype joannhackos
From:
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010
11:18 AM
To: ;
Cc: ;
Subject: RE: [chairs] What can
Standards Development / TC Administration do to help?
Yes! I'd love it.
But I can already begin to see the battle lines being drawn, i.e., which one
(DITA, Docbook, OpenDocument, . . .)?
From: Mary
McRae [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010
9:58 AM
To: Bob Freund
Cc: Dave Ings;
Subject: Re: [chairs] What can
Standards Development / TC Administration do to help?
Agreed. How would the chairs feel about mandating all specs be
created in an OASIS XML format?
m
On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Bob Freund wrote:
How much of this review might be automated?
might be a lot if we had an xml publication format.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Dave Ings wrote:
+1
This would really cut down on the iterative churn that seems to frustrate the
people involved in the publication process. Great idea!
Regards, Dave Ings,
Emerging Software Standards
Email:
Yahoo Messenger: dave_ings
<graycol.gif>Hanssens
Bart ---2010/04/22 09:02:30 AM---> Would you like us to review your
specifications prior to TC ballots so you don't need to go back a
From: Hanssens
Bart <>
To: Mary McRae <>,
""
<>
Date:
2010/04/22 09:02 AM
Subject:
RE: [chairs] What can
Standards Development / TC Administration do to help?
> Would you like us to review your
specifications prior to TC ballots so you don't need to go back and fix stuff
afterwards?
That would be very helpful indeed, especially for
new TC's / people submitting specifications for the first time...
Best regards
Bart
