There's a few free XML editors out there, or maybe a handful of companies would like to make their products available for use by TC members.
Mary
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> I see the benefit of automation of publication checking and tool driven production of various output formats. This also might make useful templates easier to work with.
>
> What about authoring tools, or would editors be working in ed/vi/emacs (not that all mind doing so)?
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:57 PM, ext Mary McRae wrote:
>
>> Agreed. How would the chairs feel about mandating all specs be created in an OASIS XML format?
>>
>> m
>>
>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Bob Freund wrote:
>>
>>> How much of this review might be automated?
>>> might be a lot if we had an xml publication format.
>>>
>>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Dave Ings wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> This would really cut down on the iterative churn that seems to frustrate the people involved in the publication process. Great idea!
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Dave Ings,
>>>> Emerging Software Standards
>>>> Email:
>>>> Yahoo Messenger: dave_ings
>>>>
>>>> <graycol.gif>Hanssens Bart ---2010/04/22 09:02:30 AM---> Would you like us to review your specifications prior to TC ballots so you don't need to go back a
>>>>
>>>> From: Hanssens Bart <>
>>>> To: Mary McRae <>, "" <>
>>>> Date: 2010/04/22 09:02 AM
>>>> Subject: RE: [chairs] What can Standards Development / TC Administration do to help?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Would you like us to review your specifications prior to TC ballots so you don't need to go back and fix stuff afterwards?
>>>>
>>>> That would be very helpful indeed, especially for new TC's / people submitting specifications for the first time...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Bart
>>>
>>
>
