Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [codelist] notes and open questions in requirements

From
Howard Mason <>
Date
2006-10-12T12:55:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [codelist] notes and open questions in requirements
My thoughts HGM> inserted below.
 
Howard Mason



From: Harris, Jim [mailto:]
Sent: 11 October 2006 19:46
To: 

Subject: [codelist] notes and open 
questions in requirements







We agreed in today’s teleconference 
that resolution was needed on some of the requirements that included notes 
and/or open questions.  These may or may not require changes to the 
requirement, but need to be reviewed to make that determination.  I have 
echoed the affected requirements below:
 
R14 Metadata can have a 
particular simple type
Metadata columns can 
have a defined data type.  The W3C XML Schema simple types are the default 
set, but a different datatype library can be specified (through the use of an 
identifying URI).
Facets can be defined 
to restrict the data type (e.g. length, minimum/maximum, or pattern 
restrictions).
Note: there is an 
option question around whether it should be possible to define the “type” of 
complex data (XML fragments) in some sense.
HGM> Not a version 1.0 requirement
R20 A code list can be 
derived from existing code lists by removing all common columns before 
aggregating the remaining columns
It should also be 
possible to remove common keys as well as common columns.  A column cannot 
be removed unless all keys that it is part of are removed, and there aggregate 
must contain at least one key.
Note: support for keys 
as well is columns is not yet implemented.
HGM> Sensible requirement, which probably needs to 
be accommodated in the metadata even if the function is not implemented in 
1.0
R21 A derived code list 
can be required to contain a source code list as a row-wise 
subset
Note: there is an open 
question about whether it should be possible to specify that only keys are 
compared, or that only particular keys are compared. 
HGM>  Probably better to allow manual selection prior to integration - 
implementation of the integration service
 
R22 A derived code list 
can be required to contain a source code list as a column-wise 
subset
It should be possible 
to specify the subset via keys as well as via columns.
Note: support for keys 
as well is columns is not yet implemented.
HGM>  Non-critical
R30 Each code list 
version has a unique identifier, different to the version-independent identifier 
for the code list
The code list 
definition contains the version number (or string) as well as the unique 
identifier (a URI).
Note: there is an open 
question around whether metadata-only code lists should be required to have 
explicit versions, especially for code lists where it is unlikely that the 
columns and keys will change over time.
HGM>  Unlikely not= never, so need the option 
for specifiying versions
R33 Sets of code list 
versions can be represented
It must be possible to 
specify a “configuration” of versions of code lists that together form a 
coherent set for some purpose.
Note: there is open 
question around whether it should it be possible to include a 
version-independent reference to a code list, instead of a reference to a 
particular version of a code list. 
HGM> Essential requirement for 
reconstructing previous configurations of codelists, eg for contractual 
reasons. 
 
 
This post is intended to prompt 
discussion (using the list) on these items.
 
Regards,
Jim
 
=================
Jim 
Harris
Senior Court 
Technology Associate
National 
Center for State 
Courts
300 Newport 
Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 
23185-4147
757-259-1804 
tel
757-564-2048 
fax
407-620-2335 
cell

http://www.ncsconline.org
 

********************************************************************

This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended

recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended

recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.

You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or

distribute its contents to any other person.

********************************************************************
Next in thread → Next in month →