Re:
> As an aside, I had a look at the documents in
> "http://docs.oasis-open.org/", and couldn't find any TCs that appear to be
> using RDDL, so I couldn't get any inspiration from what other TCs are
> doing.
Good catch, Tony. Thanks. We have an action item identifying the need for
an OASIS registry of NS URIs, but it's not yet built.
Meantime, some NS URIs that resolve to RDDLs (and indeed, this is
what we recommend):
RDDLs:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200512
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsba/2006/06
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/plnktype
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/abstract
Non-OASIS:
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/04/sc
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/eventing
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/mex
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/transfer
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/04/ssi
http://www.opengis.net/gml
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/ws-polling
http://www.w3.org/2005/SMIL21/
-rcc
=====================================================================================
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Anthony B. Coates (Miley Watts) wrote:
> By my reading of the OASIS guidelines (which I didn't find completely
> clear), the recommended namespace URI for genericode would be
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/
>
> However, for practical reasons, I think we need to add the version number,
> so that the namespace URI becomes
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/1.0/
>
> Note that this URI does not contain "/ns/" as Ken's suggested URI does. I
> don't see any place "/ns/" in the recommended format. However, I think
> the RDDL document for genericode should be located at
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/
>
> and that all URIs of the form
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/M.N/
>
> should be redirected to a RDDL document at
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/
>
> which contains information about all versions of genericode. However,
> that doesn't give us anywhere in the URL space to locate the Schemas.
>
> As an aside, I had a look at the documents in
> "http://docs.oasis-open.org/", and couldn't find any TCs that appear to be
> using RDDL, so I couldn't get any inspiration from what other TCs are
> doing.
>
> So, in spite of what is suggested in the OASIS docs, I would actually
> prefer myself to follow Ken's suggestion of
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/genericode/1.0/
>
> for the genericode 1.0 namespace URI, with this being redirected to a RDDL
> document at
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/genericode/
>
> We could then have the Schemas at (I would suggest)
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/schemas/genericode/1.0/
>
> so that there is a consistent structure to the URLs.
>
> Comments? Do we need to get OASIS to recommend something to us?
>
> Cheers, Tony.
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:42:28 +0100, G. Ken Holman
>
