Is the intent that these properties live within TAXII or on the STIX objects themselves?
From:
<> on behalf of Bret Jordan <>
Date: Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 2:51 PM
To: "" <>
Subject: [External] [cti-taxii] New properties for TAXII 2.1
All,
It has been proposed that we add some properties to collections to help identify what data markings are needed / supported in this collection. One driving aspect is with the upcoming IEP policy stuff.
It has been proposed that we add something like the following two properties:
supported_markings
required_markings
The property terms may need to be word smithed and we need to figure out how to best capture the data. But the question right now is, should we support this functionality on collections?
If so, I will add them to the TAXII 2.1 working specification so that we can being work on what they will mean.
Bret
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by
you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of
internal compliance with Accenture policy.
______________________________________________________________________________________
www.accenture.com
