Re: [cti-taxii] Manifest Resource

From
Allan Thomson <>
Date
2018-10-05T14:38:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [cti-taxii] Manifest Resource
Bret
I tried to think any case where they might not be available or generated.


  I couldn t think of any reasonable use case where the taxii server could not provide these, so I m supportive of the change.



Allan
From:
<> on behalf of Bret Jordan <>
Date:  Friday, October 5, 2018 at 7:00 AM
To:  "" <>
Subject:  [cti-taxii] Manifest Resource



All,



In looking at the Manifest Resource and its purpose, I am thinking we need to make the date added and version properties required.  I believe this was an oversight in 2.0.



Currently we have the following properties



Property Nam
e

Typ
e

Descriptio
n

id
(required)

string

The identifier of the object that this manifest entry describes. For STIX objects the

id
  MUST  be the STIX Object
id
. For object types that do not have their own identifier, the server
  MAY  use any value as the
id
.

date_added
(optional)

timestamp

The date and time this object was added.

version
(optional)

string

The version of this object.



For objects in STIX format, the STIX

modified
property is the version.

media_type
(optional)

string

The media type that this specific version of the object can be requested in. This value
  MUST  be one of the media types listed on the
collection
resource.







I propose that we change this to:



Property Nam
e

Typ
e

Descriptio
n

id
(required)

string

The identifier of the object that this manifest entry describes. For STIX objects the

id
  MUST  be the STIX Object
id
. For object types that do not have their own identifier, the server
  MAY  use any value as the
id
.

date_added
  (required)

timestamp

The date and time this object was added.

version
  (required)

string

The version of this object.



For objects in STIX format, the STIX

modified
property is the version.

media_type
(optional)

string

The media type that this specific version of the object can be requested in. This value
  MUST  be one of the media types listed on the
collection
resource.







Is there anyone that would be against this change? If no, I will create a Github issue and make the change in Working Draft 04.



Bret