Point of clarification in terms of Trey's comment regarding Specification Editors being Github Maintainers:
To what extent, if any, will these open repositories be used to host draft specifications, WIP Specifications (Work in Progress), references to same, issue tracking, etc. ? Presumably they will only be used for managing the non-normative schemas, examples,
and issue tracking related to same. Is this correct?
Patrick Maroney
President
Integrated Networking Technologies, Inc.
Desk: (856)983-0001
Cell: (609)841-5104
Email:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:53 AM -0400, "Jordan, Bret"
<> wrote:
Yes, I agree with Trey. Document Editors should be the GitHub maintainers.
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
On Sep 1, 2016, at 09:26, Trey Darley <> wrote:
On 01.09.2016 14:32:29, Back, Greg wrote:
I move to amend the below proposal as follows:
Initial Maintainers: Ivan Kirillov, Greg Back
The document editors should be Github maintainers for their respective
specifications.
--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4 5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"It is always possible to add another level of indirection." --RFC 1925
