RE: [dita-lightweight-dita] marketing template specialization

Thanks, both of you.

How do I get on the LW DITA GitHub? Can I find the link on the LW website or can you send it to me?

Kind regards, Birgit

 

Van:  [mailto:] Namens Tim Grantham
Verzonden: vrijdag 30 september 2016 15:49
Aan: Carlos Evia <>; Birgit Strackenbrock <>
CC: 
Onderwerp: RE: [dita-lightweight-dita] marketing template specialization

 

Yes, I am developing the transform. It’s almost complete, but I’m waiting for some clarification from Michael on how the proposed template specialization works.

 

Regards,

Tim.

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Carlos Evia
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:30 AM
To: Birgit Strackenbrock <>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] marketing template specialization

 

Dear Birgit,

 

I believe Tim Grantham was developing that script/transform. Our GitHub repo has the most recent version of the LwDITA plugin, and Mark Giffin has added all the template elements. However, it does not transform to a specialized topic yet.

 

Best,

 

Carlos

-- 

Carlos Evia, Ph.D.

Director of Professional and Technical Writing

Associate Professor of Technical Communication

Department of English

Center for Human-Computer Interaction

Virginia Tech

Blacksburg, VA 24061-0112

(540)200-8201

 

 

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Birgit Strackenbrock <> wrote:

 

Dear Michael,

We are working on our template and I could join the LW meeting on 17th Oct. to discuss a new template I will send around some days before the meeting. Is that ok?

 

Dear Carlos,

If I have it good in my mind you are busy developing a script to make a DTD or XSD from a template. Is that right? If yes, how far are you?

 

Kind regards, Birgit

Van: Birgit Strackenbrock [mailto:] 
Verzonden: donderdag 29 september 2016 19:37
Aan: '' <>
Onderwerp: [dita-lightweight-dita] marketing template specialization

 

Dear Michael and others,

In the last LW meeting we talked about our template specialization for marketing. I have made a lot notes but maybe not enough. Does anybody have some notes about our discussion and can send them? Thanks.

 

Furthermore, I have some new questions: 

When I will make a specialization e.g. from <section> is het enough to do it this way?

<section outputclass="action"></section>

 

Or do I have to mention the children of section also, like:

<section outputclass="action">
   <titel></titel>
   <p>...</p>
</section>

 

Kind regards, Birgit

 

 

 

 

<www.xstructuring.eu>

<>