MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
dita message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: "JoAnn Hackos" <>
To: "Rob Frankland" <>,"Paul Prescod" <>,"Don Day" <>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:48:25 -0700
Sounds like a good solution.
JoAnn
JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD
President
Comtech Services,
Inc.
710 Kipling Street, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80215
303-232-7586
http://www.comtech-serv.com
From: Rob Frankland
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:29
AM
To: 'Paul Prescod'; JoAnn Hackos; 'Don Day'
Cc:
Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in
DITA
I agree, having
followed this thread. Your suggested solution covers both use cases. I believe
the largest number of users will want the HTML/Docbook usage and this enables
the programmer writers to meet their needs as well.
Rob
From: Paul
Prescod [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 5:46
PM
To: JoAnn Hackos; Don
Day
Cc:
Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in
DITA
Okay, an emerging
consensus seems to be that <keyword> in <keywords> means
<keyword> in the HTML/Docbook sense.
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/keyword.html .
It is typically hidden from the user as metadata and embedded in the HTML meta
tag.
<keyword> in
other contexts is more like a word from an API or
language.
Should we just document
it that way? If so, I can suggest some
wordings.
Paul
Prescod
Follow-Ups:
Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: Dana Spradley <>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
