← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [dita] Negative values

From
Michael Priestley <>
Date
2006-04-18T14:20:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita] Negative values
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















dita message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [dita] Negative values




From: Michael Priestley <>
To: "Paul Prescod" <>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:23:31 -0400




What scope attribute?

Michael Priestley

IBM DITA Architect and Classification Schema PDT Lead



http://dita.xml.org/blog/25





"Paul Prescod"
<> 
04/18/2006 10:03 AM




To
<>


cc



Subject
[dita] Negative values








This document describes negative values:


http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17329/IssueNumber20.ht

ml


It isn't explicit about the semantics of them. For example, it implies

that negative and positive values can be combined in a single attribute

(otherwise why say that the NOT operator only applies to a single

value). But I would have thought that a negation of value A implies

value B by definition. Therefore explicitly stating value B is

redundant.


audience="NOT paul"


Means everybody but paul. Therefore saying "everybody but paul plus

janice" is redundant. In programming language terms:


If Audience!=paul OR audience=janice


Although I am a fan of the goals of this feature, I am not convinced

that we can work out the details in the time we have. Plus I think that

it is a bit of scope creep beyond what the TC agreed to. The same goes

for the scope attribute.


 Paul Prescod










References:

Negative values
From: "Paul Prescod" <>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread