← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Proposal for a DITA "Learning and training content specialization" subcommittee
Esteemed DITA TC members - For your consideration at the TC meeting on Tuesday, July 18, 2006, I propose that the TC officially establish a "Learning and training content" subcommittee. The below provides the proposal name, goals, deliverables, chair, and initial membership for this proposed subcommittee. Thank you for your consideration and support. John Hunt IBM Software Group/Lotus Software phone: 617.693.5490 -------------------------------------- Subcommittee name "DITA learning and training content specialization" Goals The subcommittee has the following statement of initial goals: 1. Develop a general top-level design for structured, intent-based authoring of learning content with good learning architecture, following DITA principles and best practices. Such a design would build on past work on topic-based content, reusable learning objects, and the learning content types needed to support them. Some specifics of a DITA design for learning content include: a. learning types, including assessments and exercises b. a map domain for structuring and managing the learning types as reusable learning objects c. linking, relationships, and simple sequencing d. interactions e. style policies for learning content f. dynamic sequencing. 2. Establish guidelines that promote best practices for applying standard DITA approaches to learning content, which include: a. separation of presentation and content (as much as possible) b. separation of content and context c. single sourcing, repurposing, and reuse. 3. Develop support for processing DITA for general delivery as learning and training, including print and presentation delivery to support instructor-led training (ILT), web delivery for distance learning, and computer-based training delivery in general. 4. Develop targeted support for processing DITA learning content for delivery with standards-based learning, specifically targeting SCORM and QTI. Specifically, extend DITA processing to support basic SCORM sequencing, interactions, and required SCORM LMS runtime behaviors. Leverage QTI behaviors to drive the interactions. Address the issue of "levels" from a simple implementation to full SCORM and beyond. 5. Build on existing DITA infrastructure (editors, CMS, transforms) as much as possible so learning content developers do not have to start from scratch. Proposed chair John Hunt, IBM (though open to other nominations or co-chair) Deliverables Proposed initial work products for the subcommittee include the following: Task 1: 1 month on review of structured designs for learning and how to apply DITA principles and best practices. Task 2: 1 month on developing a top-level plan for map a DITA specialization for learning content, including identifying the learning types, map domains, content domains, and processing support needed to support the design. Task 3: X months on developing DITA schemas and processing, and piloting and validating the top-level designs against sample content. Task 4: 1 month on reviewing the pilot, writing and reviewing a progress report. Close this phase of the activity with a progress report to the TC, with recommended next steps. Initial membership The following TC members have expressed interest as initial members in this subcommittee: 1. Bruce Esrig, Lucent (or other person from Lucent) 2. Jennifer Linton, Comtech Services, Inc. 3. Scott Hudson, Flatiron Solutions 4. Christian Kravogel, SeicoDyne 5. Erik Hennum, IBM 6. John Hunt, IBM In addition, several new members have expressed interest in joining the TC to participate in this SC.
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →