"Grosso, Paul" <> wrote
on 21/08/2007 11:41:39 PM:
> See also my earlier comments, few of which have been addressed.
I hope I have now, in the latest draft. If there
are any I have missed, please let me know.
> (I'll assume by "toolkits" you mean "DITA implementations".)
Yes, thanks, wording is now changed.
> The text above talks about sorting glossaries, but where in
> the DITA spec do we talk about sorting glossaries?
Nowhere, apparently, and that surprises
me. I expected the description of bookmap's <glossarylist>
to talk about sorting, but on inspection, I see that it doesn't. Is
there a consensus that it should?
(There is a bit of chicken-and-egg with
proposals like this, where one proposal is intended to provide an implementation
for other proposals. One of them has to come first, and it looks
like I was assuming that #12035 was providing for existing specifications.
It appears to be the other way around. Hmm.)
--
Deborah Pickett
Information Architect, Moldflow Corporation, Melbourne
