Sounds as if <ph> should be a
specialization of <text>. We are probably trapped by the past, however.
I wonder of <text> should be a
specialization of anything or just a new addition to the base element set for
topics and maps.
-Jeff
From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007
8:55 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [dita] <text>
element (#12020)
“text” is a
specialization of phrase that serves two purposes:
1.
Allows content model
constraints (e.g., (data, text) rather than (data | ph))
2.
Makes the semantic
clear (i.e., just a container of PCDATA with no other meaning or presentation
expectation
Cheers,
E.
----
W. Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions
Architect
Really Strategies,
Inc.
512 554 9368
From: Ogden, Jeff [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007
7:49 AM
To: ;
Subject: RE: [dita] <text>
element (#12020)
What is the difference between <ph>
and <text>? Are both needed?
-Jeff
