Here is an update to Michael’s
proposal with clarifications from today’s TC call:
Base Collection:
Base Topic
Base Map (map plus Utilities and Map Group domains)
Technical Content Collection (all topics include hazard, utility, sw, pr, and ui domains):
Topic
Concept
Task
General Task
Task with requirements domain
Reference
Glossary
Ditabase
Map
Bookmap
Classification map #1
Classification map #2
Learning and Training Content Collection:
Learning Assessment
Learning Content
Learning Overview
Learning Plan
Learning Summary
Learning Topic (Topic plus the Learning
and Training domains added)
Learning Map (Base Map plus the
Learning and Training domains added)
Learning Bookmap (Bookmap with
the Learning and Training domains added)
From: Michael
Priestley [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008
11:53 AM
To:
Subject: [dita] proposed packaging
and doctype shells for DITA 1.2
Assumptions:
-
need to keep the legacy shells from 1.1 to avoid breaking existing users
-
beyond legacy shells, adding only the bare minimum to exercise each new domain
and structural type
-
users will go to the web tool for most combinations (such as tech content with
learning objectives, or tech content without the sw domain)
Base
(2 shells):
topic and map plus utility domains
Tech
content (11 shells):
topic, concept, task, general task, task with requirements
domain, reference, glossary, ditabase (all incorp. hazard, utility, sw, pr, ui
domains);
bookmap, 2 classification maps
Learning and training (7 shells):
5 l&t topic types, topic with l&t domain, map with
l&t domain
Michael
Priestley
Lead IBM DITA Architect
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
