Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [dita] processing-role attribute [cascading]
Would it always cascade? Would it cascade from a keydef? My head is starting to hurt again. -Jeff From: Michael Priestley [mailto:] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:23 AM To: Ogden, Jeff Cc: dita; Robert D Anderson Subject: RE: [dita] processing-role attribute [cascading] Actually it could be quite useful for processing-role to cascade. For example: Author A creates a single map that defines both a TOC and the keys for the topicrefs in the TOC (not using keydef - just a single TOC with a key on each topicref) Author B wants to reuse a bunch of the topics but their own nav. So they want to use the key definitions in author A's map but not the nav structure. So they create a mapref (or a conref to a subset of the target map) setting processing-role="resourceonly". Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) Lead IBM DITA Architect http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 "Ogden, Jeff" <> 04/21/2009 11:12 AM To "Robert D Anderson" <>, "dita" <> cc Subject RE: [dita] processing-role attribute [cascading] I've got cascading on the brain and so ... I assume that @processing-role itself does not cascade. But does @processing-role="resource-only" change the cascading behavior for any other attributes or other properties? Cascading within a map? Cascading from map to map? Cascading from map to topic? -Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert D Anderson [mailto:] > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:45 AM > To: dita > Subject: [dita] processing-role attribute > > > Recently we approved adding the new processing-role attribute, with values > of "normal" and "resource-only", to topicref and its specializations. Use > of processing-role="resource-only" indicates that the target is to be used > only as a resource, without appearing in any generated TOC, not linked to, > not generated as part of PDF/XHTML/whatever other output. > > We also have a new <keydef> element as a shortcut for defining keys in > DITA > 1.2. It defaults to toc=no, linking=none, and print=no. So my question is, > should it also default to processing-role=resource-only? This seems > logical, and in fact seems part of the reason we added resource-only, but > I > don't think it was called out in the original discussion. > > Thanks - > > Robert D Anderson > IBM Authoring Tools Development > Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Next in thread →
Next in month →