Re: [dita] Conformance and interoperability

From
Eliot Kimber <>
Date
2009-07-07T11:31:11+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita] Conformance and interoperability
On 7/6/09 6:26 PM, "Michael Priestley" <> wrote:

> I'm not sure about the should vs must being a typo. I think it's currently
> must, and on purpose.

Doh! You're right--I was confusing the requirement to have documents with
DTDs or schemas (should) with the design pattern (must).

My apologies for any confusion. Too many hours spent reviewing/writing too
many pages of this spec.

Cheers,

E.

----
Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
email:   <mailto:>
office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368
2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403
www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
<http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>