Examples for the Quantities & Tolearances Proposal

Actually we have not done any thought about con/keyref.
The standard con/keyref functionalities seems to us as sufficient.
The quantity element is a specialisation of phrase, and yes, it is an inline element.
May I ask you to give us some more details to your def/ref idea.
I haven’t understood it yet.
Best regards Chris Von: Noz Urbina [mailto:] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14.
November 2012 14:39 An: Chris Kravogel; ; 
Betreff: RE: [dita] Examples for the Quantities & Tolearances Proposal Hi Chris, How do you envisage reuse happening from the <quantity> sub-elements to the actual topics?Con(key)ref? Or are the quantity definitions intended to be data-integrity checked in some other way? Or am I misreading this and the quantities will be defined inline, e.g., <p>The acceptable length for the item is </p> ? If so the option of a def/ref pair seems like a good idea here. So the XML would be: <p>The acceptable length for the item is <quantityref @somethingThatPointsToAQuantity/></p> Just my thoughts. Cheers Noz
From:  [ mailto: ] On Behalf Of Chris Kravogel Sent: 14 November 2012 13:33
To:  ; 
Subject: [dita] Examples for the Quantities & Tolearances Proposal Please find enclosed the examples/use cases for the quantities and tolerances proposal. Please reply if you have any questions or comments regarding the proposal and the examples. Best regards Chris