Hi,
[note; I originally sent this to the TC list via my regular email account a few hours ago, but it didn't show up, so I'm sending it through the OASIS web site; if it ends up showing up twice, my apologies.]
After looking at #13078, I have the following comments
table[@orient]
- Like David, I also wonder if 'port' and 'land' are the right names for these
attribute values. I noticed David suggested using the full words
portrait/landscape, but there's also the fact that if a document is
itself in landscape mode, either of those variants would be confusing.
Maybe 'standard' or 'normal' and 'rotate'? That would connect this with
the entry/@rotate attribute as well.
Other than that, I like David's suggestion of adding the text from the original proposal back into the spec language.
entry[@rotate] - I agree with David; rather than '1' and '0', I'd
prefer to use 'yes' and 'no'. Most users are neither mathematicians
nor engineers.
Thanks, Chris, for getting the implementation out.
Regards,
Nancy Harrison
--
_____________
Nancy Harrison
Infobridge Solutions
