← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
26 Aug TC Action: Note on 'xml' prefix
On 8/28/2014 1:09 PM, Nancy Harrison
wrote:
Don will draft a note on our decision to use the
'xml' prefix for our xmlmention domain, to be put into xmlmention
topic explaining the issue.
7. XML mention domain revisited
[More research has revealed that the reservation of the 'xml' string
is no longer in the XML spec, so we can avoid having to make any
changes.]
Kris; so, we were unaware of fact that it was no longer a problem.
Don; in the future, we need to be cautious; we can go ahead with
using the 'xml', but we need to explain it, for people who remember
the reservation and don't know it's gone away.
Michael; we could include a note and link in the xmlmention topic
Robert; we don't want too much, just a note and/or link in the
parent xmlmention topic.
ActionItem; Don will draft the note to be put into topic explaining
the issue.
---------------------------------
<note>Although the original XML 1.0 Recommendation
specifically reserved element names beginning with 'xml' or 'XML'
for the use of the XML standard itself, the subsequent introduction
of namespaces (for example, xml:base) made the restriction moot and
it was removed in the <xref
href="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-5e-errata">"http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-5e-errata" scope="external"
format="html">errata to the 5th edition of the XML 1.0
Recommendation</xref>, which effectively replaces the XML 1.1.
The OASIS DITA Technical Committee acknowledges this revised policy
in its use of the semantically precise prefix 'xml' for the XML
Mention domain.</note>
--
Don R. Day
Co-Founder, ContelligenceGroup.com
Founding Chair, OASIS
DITA Technical Committee
LinkedIn: donrday Twitter:
@donrday
About.me: Don R. Day Skype:
don.r.day
"Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
--T.S. Eliot
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread