Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [dita] Issues noticed with taskbody content model in various task types

From
Kristen James Eberlein <>
Date
2016-07-03T10:39:16+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita] Issues noticed with taskbody content model in various task types
The troubleshooting topic is fine; however, the machinery task
      topic does NOT contain <tasktroubleshooting>.

      

    
    
Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

      

    

    
On 7/2/2016 8:26 PM, Joann Hackos
      wrote:

    

    
      
      
Obviously we have to fix he troubleshooting topic because
        task troubleshooting is crucial to the design. We were unaware
        that we had to update the machine industry task to get this to
        work. Do you want to work with Bob and me to get the fixes in
        place?

      
JoAnn

        

        Sent from my iPad
        
JoAnn Hackos

        
President

        
Comtech Services Inc

        
710 Kipling Street Suite 400

        
Lakewood CO 80215

        
303-232-7586

        

          
 

          
Join The
              Center for Information-Development Management at the
              Content Management Strategies/DITA North America
              Conference on April 4-6, 2016.
              More information at:https://cm-strategies.com

        

      

      

        On Jul 2, 2016, at 4:49 AM, Robert D Anderson <>
        wrote:

        

      

      
        

          
I noticed an oddity with taskbody when reviewing the
            generated content model tables.

            

            Specifically, it does not allow the new
            <tasktroubleshooting> element, because the machinery
            taskbody constraint was not updated to account for it. I
            assume this was an oversight in 1.3 (probably related to the
            fact that the original owners of the Machinery Task are no
            longer participating at the TC).

            

            This led to a few discoveries in the text: 

          
            
There is a normative concept topic about the machinery
              task that specifically describes the contents - also
              missing the element. This means both our grammar files and
              our normative text do not allow for the element.

              http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part2-tech-content/archSpec/technicalContent/dita-machinerytask-topic.html

            
In the same topic, the element <prelreqs> does not
              use the new XML mention domain. This should be fixed in
              the errata. I am very happy to say this is the
              first instance I've seen where markup made it into
              the final spec without using that domain.
            

            
There is a similar concept describing general task,
              which mentions every section in the general task. It does
              not list tasktroubleshooting. In this case, the grammar
              files that allow the element are normative, so I think
              this is clearly an errata item - the concept should be
              updated to list the element.

              http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part2-tech-content/archSpec/technicalContent/dita-generic-task-topic.html

            
The same issue exists in the concept for strict task,
              which lays out the sections that can be used, in order. As
              with the general task, this looks like an errata item -
              the concept should be updated to list the element.

              http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part2-tech-content/archSpec/technicalContent/dita-task-topic.html

              
                
                  

                    Regards,
                      
Robert
                            D. Anderson
                        

                          DITA-OT lead and
                            Co-editor
                          DITA 1.3 specification,

                            Digital Services Group 

                    
                    <ecblank.gif>
                  

                  

                    
                      
                    
                  

                  

                    E-mail:
                        

                      Digital Services Group
                        
                    
                      
<0C170704.gif>

                    
                  

                  

                    11501
                          BURNET RD,, TX, 78758-3400, AUSTIN, USA
Next in thread → Next in month →