Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [dita] Issues noticed with taskbody content model in various task types
The troubleshooting topic is fine; however, the machinery task
topic does NOT contain <tasktroubleshooting>.
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
On 7/2/2016 8:26 PM, Joann Hackos
wrote:
Obviously we have to fix he troubleshooting topic because
task troubleshooting is crucial to the design. We were unaware
that we had to update the machine industry task to get this to
work. Do you want to work with Bob and me to get the fixes in
place?
JoAnn
Sent from my iPad
JoAnn Hackos
President
Comtech Services Inc
710 Kipling Street Suite 400
Lakewood CO 80215
303-232-7586
Join The
Center for Information-Development Management at the
Content Management Strategies/DITA North America
Conference on April 4-6, 2016.
More information at:https://cm-strategies.com
On Jul 2, 2016, at 4:49 AM, Robert D Anderson <>
wrote:
I noticed an oddity with taskbody when reviewing the
generated content model tables.
Specifically, it does not allow the new
<tasktroubleshooting> element, because the machinery
taskbody constraint was not updated to account for it. I
assume this was an oversight in 1.3 (probably related to the
fact that the original owners of the Machinery Task are no
longer participating at the TC).
This led to a few discoveries in the text:
There is a normative concept topic about the machinery
task that specifically describes the contents - also
missing the element. This means both our grammar files and
our normative text do not allow for the element.
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part2-tech-content/archSpec/technicalContent/dita-machinerytask-topic.html
In the same topic, the element <prelreqs> does not
use the new XML mention domain. This should be fixed in
the errata. I am very happy to say this is the
first instance I've seen where markup made it into
the final spec without using that domain.
There is a similar concept describing general task,
which mentions every section in the general task. It does
not list tasktroubleshooting. In this case, the grammar
files that allow the element are normative, so I think
this is clearly an errata item - the concept should be
updated to list the element.
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part2-tech-content/archSpec/technicalContent/dita-generic-task-topic.html
The same issue exists in the concept for strict task,
which lays out the sections that can be used, in order. As
with the general task, this looks like an errata item -
the concept should be updated to list the element.
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part2-tech-content/archSpec/technicalContent/dita-task-topic.html
Regards,
Robert
D. Anderson
DITA-OT lead and
Co-editor
DITA 1.3 specification,
Digital Services Group
<ecblank.gif>
E-mail:
Digital Services Group
<0C170704.gif>
11501
BURNET RD,, TX, 78758-3400, AUSTIN, USA
Next in thread →
Next in month →