Next in thread → Next in month →

Fwd: Re: [dita] Updated stage 3 proposal for diagnostics

From
Kristen James Eberlein <>
Date
2020-10-13T13:36:28+00:00
ID
Thread
Fwd: Re: [dita] Updated stage 3 proposal for diagnostics
Forwarding to the list. We are set to vote on this today; do we
      need to wait on that? Dawn, your intent vis-a-vis the content
      model?

    

    
Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      OASIS Distinguished Contributor

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting LLC

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)

      

    

    

      

      -------- Forwarded Message --------
      
        
          

            Subject:
            
            Re: [dita] Updated stage 3 proposal for diagnostics
          

          

            Date: 
            Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:56:20 +0000
          

          

            From: 
            Gershon Joseph <>
          

          

            To: 
            Kristen James Eberlein
              <>
          

        
      
      

      

      Hi Kris,

      

      I'm reviewing the draft and have a question. The summary of this
      stage 3 proposal reads:

      "Add an optional <diagnostics> element to the
      troubleshooting topic. This element will provide a

      location for authors to provide information about how to determine
      the cause of a problem and thus apply

      the correct remedy."

      

      My interpretation of this text is that authors can optionally add
      both the cause and steps to their troubleshooting topics. 

      The content model summarized in " Approved technical requirements"
      also leads me to think that we want to allow zero or one
      <diagnostics-general> followed by zero or one
      <diagnostics-steps>. 

      However, the DTD and RNG changes make them one or the other, not
      both.

      My concern is: what if a writer wants to add a troubleshooting
      table as well as troubleshooting steps to their
      <diagnostics> section?

      

      Am I misinterpreting the text or misreading the grammar files?

      

      I'm returning to work after a week's vacation, so my brain may
      still be partially switched off...

      

      Cheers,

      Gershon

      

      Gershon Joseph | Senior Information Architect | Precision Content
      Direct: +972 (54) 658-3887| Email:  |
      www.precisioncontent.com <http://www.precisioncontent.com/>

      

      Unlock the Knowledge in Your Enterpriseâ

      

      This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
      intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
      they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are
      notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
      action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
      prohibited. Please notify us by return email if you have received
      this email in error. Â2020, Precision Content Authoring Solutions
      Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

      

      ïOn 07/10/2020, 19:31, " on behalf of
      Kristen James Eberlein" < on behalf of
      > wrote:

      

      Modified per discussion at yesterday's TC meeting.

      

      -- Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      OASIS Distinguished Contributor

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting LLC

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)
Next in thread → Next in month →