Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: conditionalization of XML

On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:22:50AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>   Now if a number of people did voice in saying that's the kind of processing
> they really need, that there is a clean and public description with
> review of the suggested extension, then I would certainly be an early
> implementor of said feature.
> 
>     Makes sense ?

Yes, it does.

I don't know what Eric's complaint with the existing <![%cond;[..]]>
mechanism is.  Eric?

Tim.
*/