At 11:33 11/10/2002, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> I don't affirm or deny anything w.r.t. conditionalization needs. I'm
>just stating my position as the guys who implement and maintain the
>friggin' code, okay !
Corr, he's a bad tempered old b isn't he :-)
> I'm not convinced that one need acces to the DocType to conditionalize
>*processing* .
> I don't want to add an add-hoc unspecified unstructured processing
>to my toolkit and maintain it.
I think you're right btw Daniel.
Specials? Bah humbug I think is the atypical reply.
Regards DaveP.
