Re: [docbook-apps] ulink text properties in fo?

From
"Cob Rtayton"
Date
2004-12-08T09:12:38+00:00
ID
096501c4dd06$053bbd80$6400a8c0@toshiro
Thread
Re: [docbook-apps] ulink text properties in fo?
Hi Justus,
I think you are right.  The properties should go on an fo:inline inside the
fo:basic-link. I have found that XEP and Antenna House both accept color on
fo:basic-link and apply it to
the text without error.  But one shouldn't rely on non-standard behavior.
8^)

Can you file a bug report on this  at the SourceForge site?

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Justus Piater" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] ulink text properties in fo?

Michèle Garoche <> wrote on Tue, 7 Dec
2004 18:24:58 +0100:

> <xsl:attribute-set name="xref.properties">
>        <xsl:attribute name="color">blue</xsl:attribute>
> </xsl:attribute-set>

Yes, that's what I tried, but PassiveTeX does not pay attention to
it. And indeed, if I understand the XSL-FO spec correctly
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo_basic-link),
the color attribute does not apply to the fo:basic-link formatting
object. Doesn't this mean that the link text should be enclosed, e.g.,
in a fo:inline that takes the appropriate text attributes?

Justus

-- 
Justus H. Piater, Ph.D.         http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~piater/
Institut Montefiore, B28        Phone: +32-4-366-2279
Université de Liège, Belgium    Fax:   +32-4-366-2620