Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: PDF named destinations using FOP

From
<>
Date
2007-10-01T18:54:06+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: PDF named destinations using FOP
I don't know if it's a limitation of the PDF format 
itself, or simply of the Reader. But the vast majority of people use Adobe's 
Reader to view PDFs anyway, so the distinction might not be 
relevant.

 

The following Adobe tech note seems to 
indicate that the problem is fixed in Acrobat 8.0 when you browse using Firefox. 
It address opening specific pages, but I'm guessing that named 
bookmarks work the same way.

 

http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=326332&sliceId=2

 

 

  

  
  From: Jeff Powanda 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 11:39 
  AM
To: Cavicchio, Rob; 
  
Subject: RE: PDF named 
  destinations using FOP

  

  

  
Thanks. Does that 
  mean it’s a limitation of the Adobe Reader and its plugin? If so, does anyone 
  know if Adobe plans to address this problem anytime soon?

  
 

  
Regards,

  
Jeff

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: 
   [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 10:03 
  AM
To: Jeff Powanda; 
  
Subject: RE: PDF named destinations using 
  FOP

  
 

  
Named destinations 
  only work in PDF files that are served from Web servers, not in local copies 
  that exist on your hard disk. This is a long-standing limitation of 
  PDF.

  
 

  
 

  
    
 

    

    
    

    
From: Jeff 
    Powanda [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:24 
    AM
To: 
    
Subject: PDF named destinations using 
    FOP

    
Please see a message posted here 
    a while ago about PDF named destinations using FOP:

    
 

    
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/200504/msg00217.html

    
 

    
With the release of FOP 0.94, 
    FOP now supports named destinations. But I can’t get olinks from one local 
    PDF to another to work. When I click the link, it opens the PDF to the first 
    page instead of going directly to the fragment identifier (e.g., 
    filename.pdf#section).

    
 

    
Is this a bug in the link that’s 
    generated by FOP?

    
 

    
Regards,

    
Jeff
Next in thread → Next in month →