Hi Dave,
Actually, to get 'make' on Mac OS X, all you need to do is install XCode
(which is the developer tools from Apple). Ant is a little more difficult to
install, requiring some work at the command line.
Both work quite well on Mac OS X.
Paul
On 2/25/08 11:48 PM, "Dave Pawson" <> wrote:
> Hi Brad.
>
> Brad Tombaugh wrote:
>> Dave, that's an excellent overview! I have a few comments/suggestions:
>>
>> - inconsistent use of "docbook" vs. "DocBook"
> Thanks. Easy enough to fix.
>
>>
>> - perhaps use "Website" to differentiate the DTD from any arbitrary web
>> site?
>
> Good point.
>
>>
>> - DocBook:TDG is co-authored by Norm Walsh and Leonard Muellner
>
> Sorry Leonard. Will do.
>
>>
>> - Another reason to use Website is that it builds all of the navigation
>> system for you automatically, once you have defined the structure.
>
> (And rebuilds it all when you change the site!)
> Done.
>
>>
>> For the issue with versions in the directory names, you might suggest
>> making an alias/symbolic link/shortcut instead of renaming the
>> directory? Then you could easily switch versions by changing where the
>> link points?
>
> Which would grow more complex over time?
> -1
>
>
>
>>
>> I have used Website for some time as well, but use a combination of Make
>> script, xsltproc, and rsync instead of ant. Rsync and xsltproc are
>> standard in Mac OS X, and make is installed as part of the Developer
>> tools,
> (on *nix).
>
> so the only items that need to be installed on OS X are the DTD
>> and style sheets. I could send an example script if you are interested.
>
> Part of my choice for ant was cross OS support.
> I've no idea if it works on Mac or not.
>
> I'd appreciate any input on that.
> Without installing quite a bit of software, the *nix tools aren't
> available to Windows users, so I'm reluctant to even mention them.
> Recall the reader is the non-geek?
>
> Thanks Brad.
>
> Appreciated.
>
>
>
> regards
